☰
Checklist
Photos
Relationships
Symposia
Syrphidae?
Login [not yet]
Checklist
Photos
Relationships
Symposia
Syrphidae?
Login
Scaeva nigritarsis Zetterstedt, 1843:710
Pipiza dolosa Walker, 1857:156
Baccha vespaeformis Doleschall, 1857:411
Syrphus capensis Wiedemann, 1830:127
Eupeodes (s.s.) Osten Sacken, 1877:328
Eupeodes (s.s.)
Osten Sacken, 1877:328
Parent:
Eupeodes
Osten Sacken, 1877:328
↰
Siblings ⇵
Eupeodes
(Metasyrphus)
lundbecki
(Soot–Ryen, 1946):196
Eupeodes
braggii
Jones, 1917:221
Eupeodes
weldoni
Jones, 1917:221
Macrosyrphus
Matsumura, 1917:23
Metasyrphus
candidus
Matsumura, 1918:17
Metasyrphus
nigrocomus
Hull, 1943:48
Metasyrphus
Matsumura, 1917:147
Children ⇶
Eupeodes
volucris
Osten Sacken, 1877:329
Published name
category
status
Name
Subgenus
Epithet
var.
Subspecies
Author(s)
Year
Page of publication
Bracket
available
valid
fossil
Citation(s)
• Osten Sacken, C. R. 1877. Western Diptera: Descriptions of new genera and species of Diptera from the region west of the Mississippi and especially from California. Bull. U.S. Geol. Geogr. Surv. Terr. 3: 189-354. [1877-04-30]
Details
parentname
type information
volucris Osten Sacken (MO)
range
notes
Doug Yanega : Included only one species, volucris. This epithet falls under 31.2.2 (either a noun or an adjective), and since there is no etymology, it is a noun by default. Since it is a noun, Eupeodes is M by default, because nouns can't be used as evidence for gender. Good thing, because it is a feminine noun or a feminine adjective, and everyone treats the genus as masculine. No need to reverse that, though I'd wager that Osten-Sacken actually intended for it to be feminine.
Modified timestamp
by
SyrphID: 9fca5ecc-cdb5-4d0d-82c4-5cddb00082d8
×
Username
Password
Login
Remember me
Cancel
Forgot
password?
unless otherwise stated